Comments on: Look Familar? http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/ Down Under Punditry in the Middle East Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:23:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/comment-page-1/#comment-2876 Anonymous Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:16:50 +0000 http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/#comment-2876 More likely proof that they, like the Nazis and loads of others, draw their inspiration from the Romans. It's essentially a Roman "Ave" which was stolen by the Nazis (as was the Eagle symbol, also used by the Palestinians and lots of Arab states). We're still in the Roman galut, man. More likely proof that they, like the Nazis and loads of others, draw their inspiration from the Romans. It’s essentially a Roman “Ave” which was stolen by the Nazis (as was the Eagle symbol, also used by the Palestinians and lots of Arab states).

We’re still in the Roman galut, man.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/comment-page-1/#comment-2875 Anonymous Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:50:47 +0000 http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/#comment-2875 "1. Is this not proof that the PLO Arabs draw inspiration from the Nazis?" Not quite. As a matter of fact the jury is still out on if the nazis drew inspiration from the pre-PLO arabs or viceversa. “1. Is this not proof that the PLO Arabs draw inspiration from the Nazis?”

Not quite. As a matter of fact the jury is still out on if the nazis drew inspiration from the pre-PLO arabs or viceversa.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/comment-page-1/#comment-2874 Anonymous Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:05:59 +0000 http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/#comment-2874 Alice: And then what? Alice: And then what?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/comment-page-1/#comment-2873 Anonymous Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:42:58 +0000 http://www.israellycool.com/2005/02/15/look-familar/#comment-2873 That was funny then frightening then funny then frightening. That was funny then frightening then funny then frightening.

]]>