Would she be shocked to discover that the very same newspaper layout and graphics people worked on terror stories and the visits of Hollywood twits?

What an idiot!

Yaakov Kirschen

Dry Bones

Think about it. A reporter today is an omnivore devoid of morality and respect for anything and anyone. They exploit everything and everyone to sell more magazines or get higher TV ratings. When a tragedy like a suicide bombing happens, they are all over it, when a celebrity passes by, they are all over it- and so they serve to erase the difference between the two in the public perception. A celebrity is a news item, so is a suicide bombing. And just like they invade Natalie’s privacy, they will invade the privacy of victims of terror attacks, for the same purpose- boosting sales. Have we not seen it happen? Have we not read interviews where reporters asked the mother of a child killed in a terror attack last night “would you be willing to forgive your child’s killers”? To me, it seems obvious that this disregard for human dignity begins when it becomes permissible to ask celebritiesabout things that a normal human being wouldn’t tell a stranger at gunpoint. Yes, I know, there is a difference- but I can’t help but feel that the two are indeed connected.