Operation Summer Rains: Day Six
The terrorists have today issued an ultimatum: Israel is to release 1,000 palestinians jailed in Israel by Tuesday 6:00AM or “pay the consequences.” If the groups do not hear from Israel by that time, they will regard the abduction of Corporal Gilad Shalit a “closed case.” While the terrorists did not elaborate on this, it is clear that there is an implied threat.Aren’t they supposed to be neutral?
11:05PM: Ghazi Hamad, the Hamas “government” spokesman is reported as saying the following:
“Since the kidnapping of the Israeli soldier we have called for the need to protect his life and solve the problem through calm diplomatic channels….We reiterate the necessity to resolve this problem with logic and wisdom and we think there remains a chance to reach an acceptable formula.”
Meanwhile, their ultimatum expires in 7 hours.
9:20PM: Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon has warned the terrorists that if they dare harm Gilad, “the sky would come crashing down on them.”
8:50PM: Defense Minister Amir Peretz has warned Syria:
“I suggest that [Syrian President] Bashar Assad, who is trying to operate with his eyes shut tight, open his eyes, because he is responsible,” Peretz cautioned.
Shouldn’t be too hard for the dorktator, considering he is an ophthalmologist.
Israel would “know how to reach everyone responsible” if Shalit is harmed, Peretz said.
8:10PM: Israeli television reports that IDF operations in Gaza will not be widened tonight.
7:27PM: Here’s a news alert that illustrates my last point nicely:
United Arab List Chairman al-Sana calls on Hamas to extend its deadline (Haaretz)
The United Arab List is a party in the Knesset. Notice how they are not calling for the release of the Israeli soldier, but only an extension of the deadline.
7:15PM: Ynetnews reports on the rising tension between Jewish and Arab MKs, as the latter express solidarity with the imprisoned Hamas officials, and generally show where their loyalties don’t lie.
for the terrorists to release Gilad Shalit, and to stop attacking
Israeli cities. He also called for Israel to exercise restraint.
3:25PM: Israel has rejected
the Hamas ultimatum, with PM Olmert stating that Israel would not bow
to extortion by the Palestinian Authority or the Hamas government.
continues to demonstrate his discomfort with being Jewish. More to the
point, he shows why he is unlikely to ever be a credible journalist.
Why can Israel behave as it likes? It’s a God-given right.No wonder Zionism is finding it difficult to recruit new believers.
“new believers” at a rapid rate. Probably helped to a large extent by
the Islamic terrorists’ crusade against the free world.
About the Author
An Australian immigrant to Israel, Aussie Dave has been blogging since early 2003.Filed Under: General



Summer Rains, Day Six
Israellycool is still liveblogging the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. Of particular note is an ultimatum from kidnappers of Ghilad Shalit, which has been rejected by Israel….
Thanks again, for doing this
)
Regarding Op Summer Rains Day 6:
‚ÄúIsraeli military officials have been quoted as saying Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had backed a “limited operation” targeting the “terrorist infrastructure”.‚Äù (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5123262.stm)
How would your government react to the destruction of a power station supplying its much of its public with power? From the article you sourced:
“There is no doubt that Israel has not taken the precautions required of it in international law to protect the civilian population and infrastructure.”
Maybe the Swiss are being neutral. Being neutral means making accusations when one side behaves wrongly. And:
“Both the principle of proportionality and the ban on collective punishment are found in the Fourth Geneva Convention, which spells out the obligations of occupying powers toward the civilian population under their control. Israel has used tanks, troops, gunboats and aircraft to press terrorists to free a captured Israeli soldier.”
Do you deny collective punishment is going on? A kassam rocket has caused a forest fire? Let‚Äôs get some perspective, one – what about the sonic boom attacks your planes carry out over Palestine which cause miscarriages. Does that not count as murder ‚Äì can you tell if babies will grow up to be terrorists?
How would your government react to the news that two “militants” (“soldiers”?) were kidnapped?
(I use the word militant/terrorist advisedly as the Palestinians accused are suspected terrorists, but the Corporal kidnapped could be described as a terrorist by the Palestinians – another example of how easily words can be abused by any side). You are aware of this event I hope:
“Gaza Strip arrests
Israeli forces have detained two Palestinians, who the army said were Hamas militants, in the Gaza Strip, in what observers said was the first arrest raid in the territory since Israel pulled out of the area a year ago.” (Observer, June 25 2006)
What does “terrorist” or “militant” actually mean? Do you not think you are terrorising people who have as much right to live as you? Do you have more right than them?
Regarding your picture quiz – what are you like??? Are Israelis the only people with feelings? On a wider level this works with your point about propaganda and shows how easy it is for people to produce pictures of the grief of Palestinians and of Israelis. Hey, maybe that’s something you do have in common…?
Regarding comments made to my comment:
‚ÄúNot a joke, actually. The palestinians who escaped into Sinai were Hamas terrorists – not innocent civilians – so I would not have shed any tears had they been killed.‚Äù Aussie Dave
Where they all innocent civilians? I honestly don’t know but I thought your photo showed civilians being ordered along. Either I misunderstood the photo or you’re using a wrong photo to illustrate a point. Either way it shows how easy it is to create propaganda.
“Question, is Israel at war or not at war with the Palestinians? As per your comment most Paestinians believe they are at war. So what is Israel to do.“ NeverForget
Look at the problems in Ireland, or in Spain with ETA. These are areas with a history combating terrorism. Nobody can be perfect but some good ideas can arise. Like the idea not to always fight fire with fire. When the Omagh bomb tore a community apart did the governing bodies start a war? It’s worth looking into.
“The Palestinians need to be defeated to the point that they see violence is no longer an option and the world needs to let them be defeated.” NeverForget
Are you promoting the murder of a people? And violence only breeds violence.
“As for the EU and other peoples concern that Israel has broken international law by arresting Hama MPs, Israel own attorney general has ruled the action is illegal and is looking to have them released.” NeverForget
Good!
“Tell me are the PRC terrorist or soldiers?” NeverForget
Either term is propaganda and can be used by either side. The Israelis have certainly been terrorised by militants, and I would say the Palestinians have certainly been terrorised by militants.
”This is the best way forward. Show the Palastinian people that when they put murderous thugs with no sense of reason in charge of their country they will have to deal with immediate countervailing force, and all of the infra-structure damage and civilian casualties happen.” Kristopher
Given what Ariel Sharon has done, and celebrated, in the past – could they say to you he was a “murderous thug”? Should they do what you say? It would recycle the violence.
”You have noted that the faux outrage of the world seems to either not be as effective or as loud as before, likewise you have noted several editorials in favor of Israel.
I submit that because our Arab friends choose to attack Israel proper it took the teeth out of the “occupation” arguement that was playing as propaganda. This has changed the stakes of the game to the point where Israel doesn’t have to worry about international pressue stopping things.
In addition the IDF has demonstrated quite strongly over the last few days that it can strike in Gaza whenever it is necessary or proper. Because there are no settlers to protect that gives the IDF an offensive ability while not providing static targets.
In the long run I still think it is a winner. I could be dead wrong but that’s how I see it.‚Äù Anonymous
It’s an interesting point and it does seem there’s a full spectrum of view on the Corporal affair. I’m interested in what constitutes winning in the long run?
‚ÄúLet’s face it, the other Arab nation’s don’t care for the Palestinians – they’re rabid troublemakers – anymore than the west does (the arab refugees from 1948 onwards left festering, while the jewish refugees have been absorbed into mainstream life in Israel).‚Äù Chrisse
“Rabid troublemakers” might be a bit strong/racist – have you any evidence to back your claim that other Arab nations don’t care up?
‚Äù suggest you go back to the origins of this conflict and I mean around 1920′s. As a British citizen you will find some things there to hang your head in shame, eg Haj Amin al-Husseini, nazi war collaborator and criminal, uncle of Arafat, and responsible for bringing terrorism to the world as a method of bring the opposition to its knees in appeasement.‚Äù Chrisse
I agree the Brits have a lot to be shameful of. Not least our sponsoring of the White revolution in Iran in 1955 due to our interest in…oil. Is there a running theme here? In fact, there’s a good graphic novel on Iran which has been compared in it’s power and information to Art Spiegelman’s Maus – it’s called Persepolis, by Marjane Satrapi. I wish we could learn lessons from our history and see how Britain, France, Holland, Japan etc went wrong, and what we did right, and how we can help to minimise future wrongs.
‚ÄùThere is a two-state solution in place now – it is Israel and Jordan.‚Äù Chrisse
Is this seriously discussed?
Sorry for such a long rant. But for all this to kick off again after a century of war, the Holocaust, racial divide and ethnic cleansing, don’t you think it’s a shame few people look at if these problems can be tackled in a way that is positive for both sides. Killing the other person is just an easy way out – the lowest common denominator of actions.