Comments on: Al Qaeda Target Killed in Syria

By: Trish

Trish — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:14:34 +0000

Terrorism respects no borders, either. This is a legitimate reason to be angry–for the US. Harboring terrorists is a crime against humanity.

By: Zach

Zach — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:23:25 +0000

Well Syria said that it completely disrespected their sovereignty and borders, which I think is a legitimate excuse to be angry.

By: Stan

Stan — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:56:13 +0000

I have opposed the war in Iraq from the start because I believe that it was a massive tactical error in the war on terrorism (It probably had more to do with oil interests then terrorism). This action was a good move. It sent a clear message to Syria. Stan

By: Bubbe

Bubbe — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:36:18 +0000

Michael Yon writes: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/syria-iraq-bloody-bo...” target=”_blank”>” target=”_blank”>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/syria-iraq-bloody-bo...

By: Bubbe

Bubbe — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:23:20 +0000

Syria might better understand the message that was sent — DON'T harbor and support terrorists.

By: Trish

Trish — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:19:32 +0000

"A flagrant violation of international law"? Considering the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the US, I don't see how that can be so.

By: israellycool

israellycool — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:09:56 +0000

I don't think there will be any war with Syria over this incident. But I do believe that the next war with Israel will involve coordination between Syria, Hizbullah, and Iran.

By: Zach

Zach — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:28:27 +0000

I'm not really sure what to think of this. On the one hand it certainly got the job done, on the other it was clearly a flagrant violation of international law (I dunno about 'human rights') and is massively damaging for US relations with the rest of the region. Do you think a war with Syria may becoming our way? Or is it too soon to tell?