Comments on: Terrorists By a Different Name

By: Michael Zvi Krumbein

Michael Zvi Krumbein — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:05:51 +0000

It is racist to use the Arabic pronunciation of the word?

By: Michael Zvi Krumbein

Michael Zvi Krumbein — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:02:10 +0000

Yes, they are. Obama only extracts concessions from Israel.

By: Michael Zvi Krumbein

Michael Zvi Krumbein — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:32:59 +0000

Right now, as the continuation of a process that started at least with the beginning of the State, the last Jews of Yemen, who have been there since King Solomon, fled the country to avoid being attacked by their Arab neighbors. They are now in the U.S.

The reason they were threatened is because of presumed actions by Israel. Now these Jews had nothing to do with it, and Israel of course did not threaten Yemen. A significant percantage of the Jews in Israel are here for that reason.

This is what happens to Jews who live among Arabs. (Originally this was true for Christians also.) Everything can go fine, and then, because of some perceived action by Jews somewhere else, or simply because they appear to be too "uppity", their lives are endangered. This is why there has to be a Jewish state in the Middle East, and one with borders more defensible than the rediculous "green line".

By: Shoko

Shoko — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:19:42 +0000

> What did the modern Jews of Yemen do to deserve being forced to leave after three thousand years?

So, does it mean any grace of modern Israel?

By: Shoko

Shoko — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:17:18 +0000

> in indiscriminate murder while pointing the bloody finger at others.

This is right if it ir for Israel.

> It's rather ironic how all the diligent US efforts to secure more Israeli concessions go unrewarded. No matter how much it tries, it still gains the hatred of ungrateful people.

If the efforts are to right direction, they would be rewarded. The more one-sided the US efforts are, the more unrewarded. That's logic.

By: Michael Zvi Krumbein

Michael Zvi Krumbein — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:15:14 +0000

Oh, by the way, what is yiur native language? It clearly isn't English.

By: Michael Zvi Krumbein

Michael Zvi Krumbein — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:13:36 +0000

Let me try one simple question.

What did the modern Jews of Yemen do to deserve being forced to leave after three thousand years?

By: Y.K.

Y.K. — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:23:46 +0000

One has to admit, you make a half-decent propagandist – you ignore what people say in order to repeat your soundbites endlessly. You also lack all shame which is good in your chosen profession: it helps you to support a movement which is steeped in indiscriminate murder while pointing the bloody finger at others.

P.S. It's rather ironic how all the diligent US efforts to secure more Israeli concessions go unrewarded. No matter how much it tries, it still gains the hatred of ungrateful people.

By: Shoko

Shoko — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:59:59 +0000

> Resolution 242 does not require return of all territories (except in French). IIRC, it refers to "'secure and recognized boundaries'" (which the '67 line is not) .

That's the matter. 242 in English does not say "all the territory" because US and Britin fussed over Israel.

> The Irgun's actions were in response to terrorism, and the failure of the British to act. If you do not know about the Arab muders of Jews that preceded them, you do not know any history.

You are brainwashed by the history you learned. Don't you know Plan D?
Why can the Irgun's well-designed killing be justified? If it is possible to justify Irgun, why not Hamas? I understand you are taught very one-sided history.

By: Shoko

Shoko — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:51:19 +0000

One sided approach?

Oh, yes. U.S.A. has been supporting Israel, exporting weapons and defining Palestinians as terrorists.

How many Palestinians have you killed? How much land have you usurped?

"Unilateral" is the word for Israel.