The Day In Israel: Monday Aug 16th, 2010

Israel has made it clear we’ll reject any Quartet preconditions for Middle East peace negotiations between Israel and the palestinans.

On the eve of a much-anticipated breakthrough in the deadlocked peace process, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is remaining firm in his position that no preconditions should be set for direct talks with the Palestinians, officials told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday night.

It’s a stance that sets Netanyahu in opposition to the Quartet, which is expected to issue a statement within 24 to 48 hours that likely includes preconditions that it hopes would be used as a basis for such talks.

Although the US is a member of the Quartet, it has been working separately to push the two sides together, and at present Israel has shown a preference for the American efforts.

“The Quartet statement is a fig leaf. We would accept only an American statement that would not include preconditions,” an official told the Post, adding that Israel hoped direct talks would start over the weekend or at least by next week.

The Palestinians, in contrast, want to push forward on the basis of a March 19 Quartet statement, which they assume would be reiterated now, including the Quartet’s support for dividing Jerusalem and calling on Israel to halt settlement construction.

The PA has asked the US to agree to this proposal as well.

As of press time, David Hale, an assistant to US special envoy George Mitchell, was meeting with PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

He was expected to deliver the US response to the Palestinian proposal. Palestinian officials told the Post late Sunday night that Abbas had decided to call a meeting of the PLO Executive Committee to discuss whether to enter direct talks with Israel.

The committee is likely to meet Monday or Tuesday, and Abbas is not expected to state his position on direct talks until after the meeting.

Should Abbas agree to resume direct negotiations with Israel, which broke off in December 2008, it would be on the understanding that Israel would extend the 10- month moratorium on new settlement construction past its expiration date of September 26.

The PA, however, is expected to back away from its demand that Israel halt all settlement construction as a precondition for talks, and settle instead for a statement by the Quartet that Israel should not be building in West Bank settlements.

An Israeli official, however, said that Netanyahu had not changed his stance that the moratorium would end on September 26.

As he prepared to leave for Greece on Monday for what would be the first visit there by an Israeli premier, Netanyahu met with the members of his inner cabinet, known as the septet.

According to media reports, the septet endorsed Netanyahu’s stance not to accept the Quartet statement on the understanding that it would set preconditions for talks – some of which Israel has long opposed, such as a halt to all settlement construction.

It preferred instead to wait for a statement about the talks from the Americans, which could also be issued this week.

Israeli officials reiterated that since taking office, Netanyahu had wanted to hold direct talks with the Palestinians and hoped that the Palestinians would come to the table.

Syria terroristsMeanwhile, while Israel will reject preconditions for direct talks from the Quarter, a group of TRES (Target Rich Environment Scumbags) has rejected the notion of negotiations.

Hamas and 10 Damascus-based Palestinian organizations declared they oppose the resumption of direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority on Sunday. The Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front – General Command and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine were among the groups represented in the statement.

“The Palestinian refusal movements confirm their objection to direct or indirect talks and warn against the dangerous consequences of a policy which undermines national Palestinian rights. Return to direct negotiations is capitulation to the demands of the US and the Zionists, who seek to abolish these rights,” the joint statement read.

Updates (Israel time; most recent at top)

10:52PM: The IDF killed 2 palestinian terrorists trying to lay a bomb. They’ll be trying to lay 72 virgins now.

This was followed by 2 rockets fired into Israel, with no injuries nor damage reported.

8:40PM: Amazing story of a young Iranian Jew who who instead of joining the Iranian army, fled to Israel and became an outstanding IDF soldier,

7:14PM: Harvard’s John Longbrake addresses the Harvard Management Company’s divesting from Israeli holdings issue:

From: “Longbrake, John” <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:08:31 -0400

To: xxxxxxx

Subject: RE: Harvard Management Company Divesting from Israeli Holdings- Please Explain

Dear Dr. XXX

Thank you for taking the time to write.

The Management Company’s most recent SEC filing details changes in holdings, as is routine, but no change in policy. The University has not divested from Israel. Israel was moved from the MSCI, our benchmark in emerging markets, to the EAFE index in May due to its successful growth. Our emerging markets holdings were rebalanced accordingly. We have holdings in developed markets, including Israel, through outside managers in commingled accounts and indexes, which are not reported in the filing in question.

I hope that this is helpful.

Sincerely,

John

5:20PM: Head Hamashole Mahmoud al-Zahar has said says Muslims “have to build” a mosque near ground zero so that followers can pray, just like Christians and Jews build their places of worship.

Yes, apparently Christians and Jews build their places of workship near the location of their terrorist attacks

2:20PM: Regarding the news that the Harvard Management Company has sold all of its holdings in Israeli companies (see 9:25AM update), Business Insider has noticed something else which could point to a political motive.

As long as we’re speculating about possible politics behind the latest portfolio shuffling at Harvard Management Company, here’s something interesting.

First, here are the iShares (ETFs) it held after Q1.

harvard shares

Note that the iShares MSCI Israel is in there.

Now, check out its latest 13-F. Goodbye Israel, hello Turkey.

harvard shares

Bear in mind that the infamous flotilla incident happened in Q2. Just saying.

1:10PM: Headline Most Likely to Mislead award of the day goes to Ynetnews:

brain headline

Organ harvesting conspiracy theorists will have a field day with that. And it only gets worse when you click through to the article.

brain headlineBut here’s what it is really about:

They could be the State’s best ambassadors abroad, but there are those who would like to see them back here, living and working in Israel. The fight against the brain drain is back on, and a first-of-its-kind database of over 4,500 names of scientists, academics and high-tech experts living abroad has been compiled. The goal: To reach every single one of them and convince them to return to Israel.

The database includes the home and work addresses of the expats, and the government plans to form a personal plan for each individual aimed at bringing them home.

The project is the brainchild of two Israeli businesspeople, Dr. Nurit Eyal and Dan Vilensky, who decided to volunteer to bring Israeli brains back to the Jewish State. The two approached the Ministry of Science and Technology, which decided to step up the fight.

With the help of the Yad Hanadiv Foundation, the ministry funded an extensive campaign to locate high-tech experts and scientists abroad and set an initial target of at least 5,000 people. As part of the efforts, various marketing tactics were employed to reach the expats, including ads in foreign media, on online social networks, and in universities around the world.

According to the data collected so far, there are currently 3,348 Israeli ‘brains’ living in the United States, 385 living in Canada, 340 in England, 131 in Australia and a few hundred others around the world.

The numbers show that people working in the high-tech and computer fields make up the majority of Israelis emigrating for economic reasons. Data is still being collected, and the plan’s next phase includes practical steps to try to reach the expats.

An inter-ministerial committee, comprised of representatives from the Education Ministry, the Science and Technology Ministry, the Council for Higher Education’s committee for budget and planning and the Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, is currently forming and operational plant to enable the professionals’ return to Israel. The committee is headed by Gilad Avrahami, a senior deputy director general for economics and entrepreneurship at the Immigrant Absorption Ministry.

One of the campaign’s main plans, spearheaded by Education Minster Gideon Sa’ar and Professor Manuel Trachtenberg, head of the budget and planning committee, aims to open 30 research excellence centers that would bring back some 300 excelling Israeli researchers. “It’s a plan of Zionism and excellence,” Minister Sa’ar said, “Which will highlight the universities’ and higher education institutes’ strong points.”

Professor Trachtenberg said on Sunday that the committee has already been contacted by scientists abroad who wish to join the excellence centers. “In order to ensure they have a safe landing,” he explained, “each returning scientist will be integrated in the academic staff of one of the universities and will receive some of the highest and longest research grants given since the establishment of the State. We’re talking about NIS 2 million (roughly $500,000) for five years to carry out research, and another grant for the purchase of laboratory equipment, literature, and digital information databases.”

Dr. Eyal, who started nanotechnology companies and now works as an advisor in the field for various companies, explained that the main hurdle keeping Israeli professionals abroad is the lack of employment in the State. To combat this, Israeli high-tech companies are currently being contacted in hopes of recruiting them to absorb the Israelis coming back to work.

According to estimates, says Eyal, there are currently between 20,000 and 30,000 Israeli academics living abroad. “In universities in the US alone there are some 1,400 Israeli researchers employed in senior staff,” she said. “We have come to understand that something must be done to get the scientists back in Israel. We met with many Israelis who showed interest in the prospects of coming back, but are not aware of the existing opportunities or cannot find jobs that suit their skills.”

“Every Israeli that we manage to bring back brings with him some NIS 3 million (roughly $800,000), since in professions such as medicine and biology, the State invests some NIS 2 million (roughly $500,000) training them, and they acquire much experience in the countries where they live. There will be those who will bring back even more, since they include executives who can start up new industries in Israel. People want to come back, because this is their culture and this is their home.”

1:04PM: Israeli TV host/comedian Yair Nitzani explains being Jewish to foreign workers.

9:38AM: Yesterday, I posted about Iranian taekwondo fighter Mohammed Soleimani’s refusal to compete against Israel’s Gili Haimovich in the championship match of the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics in Singapore.

Now I see more evidence of an Iranian competitor’s bad sportsmanship and politicization of sport.

Tarikulu Bahri

Tarikulu Bahri of Iran celebrates after winning the mens under 87 kg final match at the WTF Taekwondo 2009 Championships in Copenhagen October 17, 2009. REUTERS

What Reuters has completely missed is the fact he is holding a Turkish – not Iranian – flag.

But upon further investigation, I see that he is actually Turkish!

9:25AM: Globes reports the Harvard Management Company has sold all of its holdings in Israeli companies (via Memeorandum):

In another blow to Israeli shares, the Harvard Management Company notified the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Friday that it had sold all its holdings in Israeli companies during the second quarter of 2010. No reason for the sale was mentioned. The Harvard Management Company manages Harvard University’s endowment.

Harvard Management Company stated in its 13-F Form that it sold 483,590 shares in Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Nasdaq: TEVA; TASE: TEVA) for $30.5 million; 52,360 shares in NICE Systems Ltd. (Nasdaq: NICE; TASE: NICE) for $1.67 million; 102,940 shares in Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (Nasdaq: CHKP) for $3.6 million; 32,400 shares in Cellcom Israel Ltd. (NYSE:CEL; TASE:CEL) for $1.1 million, and 80,000 Partner Communications Ltd. (Nasdaq: PTNR; TASE: PTNR) shares for $1.8 million.

Harvard Management Company’s 13-F Form shows some interesting investments. Its two largest holdings, each worth $295 million, are in iShares ETFs, one on Chinese equities, and the other on emerging markets. Harvard also owns $181 million in a Brazilian ETF.

It is not yet clear why they have done this. But as Solomon warns:

People. Never go off the deep end on these things without waiting for an explanation or a statement. I find it highly unlikely that a fund like Harvard is going to divest from Israeli stocks — all Israeli stocks — for political purposes. You don’t think Dershowitz is picking up the phone right now for answers?

9:15AM: A few months ago, a Jewish moonbat by the name of Emily Henochowicz lost an eye after being hit by a tear gas canister while protesting the flotilla incident. Eyewitnesses claimed that the gas canisters were aimed intentionally at demonstrators, contradicting the results of the Border Police’s internal probe that indicated  the tear gas projectile hit a wall and subsequently flew at Henochowicz.

A statement from the Border Police spokesperson said: “The investigation carried out by the IDF showed that the forces operated at the site impeccably and utilized means according to procedure. There was no directly-aimed fire in the incident.”

Here is some footage confirming the Border Police’s findings, in which you can clearly see the Turkish-flag carrying Henochowicz floored by a tear gas canister that ricochets off a wall.

6:05AM: On Huda TV’s question time, the Muslim “scholar” rants against Israel.

Notice that he admits Muslim violence is terrorism (3:55), says we are worse than any disease that we have ever known (4:40) and advocates violence against Israel which is mandated by the Quran (4:48).

Did he even answer the question?

************************************************************************************

September specials at the Okeanus Hotels in Israel.  Suites, Sea, and Style.

Rooms start at only $170. Click here for more details.

************************************************************************************

About Aussie Dave

An Aussie immigrant to Israel, Aussie Dave is founder of Israellycool, one of the world's most popular pro-Israel blogs (and the one you are currently reading) He is a happy family man, and a lover of steak, Australian sports and girlie drinks

comments

  • Joo-Liz

    About the tear gas ricochet video — it's really hard to see the actual ricochet.

    I'm not convinced I can make it out at all.

    If I saw the video without the captions, I'd probably swear there was no ricochet.

    • walt kovacs

      watch it again…you can see it bounced off the median

      you will also notice that emily is marching across the road….

      in her interviews she said that she was looking for a place to hide….she is a liar

      • juvanya

        I cant really tell if it bounces of the road, bounces of the wall, or hits her and bounces of the wall and hits her again. I think its the road though.

  • David

    With regard to the Harvard "divestment" it has actually has nothing to do with Israel or BDS. It's actually a result of Israel's economic progress. The Harvard fund in question invests in emerging markets. However, Israel is now in the OECD, so Harvard shifted its money out of Israel into other, less developed, countries.

    Aussie Dave, if you want the source of that information email me, it's from people at Harvard itself. dmb225 at gmail dot com

    • The Dude

      Sorry but I have to ask one question David, isn't Turkey also in the OECD? So aren't they officially a developed country as well? And isn't odd that they liquidated their money from Israeli holdings and then moved it to Turkey?

  • James

    Dave – if it is OK for Jews to have synagogues and Christians to have churches, then Muslims can have mosques. You are walking on a fine line here. As a long time visitor to the site, I expect better from you. Just saying.

    • http://www.israellycool.com/ israellycool

      Easy! Read my post. I was commenting on Zahar's statement, not making the point that Muslims cannot have mosques.

      • Jim from Iowa

        But it did seem like you were throwing all Muslims into the same pot, Dave. Although I haven't changed my mind on the mosque issue (I'm in the pro camp) I'm beginning to think there is a kind of middle ground. A majority of people living in lower Manhattan seem to think this group planning to build the Islamic cultural center, which will hold a mosque, two blocks from ground zero is being insensitive. I hate to think this issue has dredged up terrible memories of 9-11 for New Yorkers. I just want the issue to go away. So build it a mile and a half away from ground zero if that will make everyone happy.

        • http://www.israellycool.com/ israellycool

          No, I was making fun of Zahar's statement comparing Muslims right to build a mosque near ground zero so that followers can pray, just like Christians and Jews build their places of worship.

          For the record, I do have a problem with a mosque near Ground Zero. I don't have a problem with Muslims building mosques in general, as long as they are not used to spread hatred and violence. Do I believe all Muslims engage in such activity? No.

          • James

            A mosque isn't being built at Ground Zero, as a symbol of victrory. So how near is near? 2 Blocks, Manhatten Island, New York State, anywhere in the US? Does the US have freedom of religion or does it not? Is Lower Manhatten being made Muslim free because of Ground Zero?

            Should Hebron be cleared of Jews because of Baruch Goldstein? No. Should Jews be stopped from visiting the Cave of the Patriarchs? No. Should a memorial to Baruch Goldstein be built? No.

            Same basic principle as above? Yes. I can understand why people at first may feel it is wrong to have a mosque in Manhatten, but when you think about it a bit more, you have to realise that it is "slightly misguided" to think that way.

            • Michael Zvi Krumbein

              The fact that is was originally to be named Cordoba (the name of a Mosque symbolizing the conquest of Spain, to simplify) does raise some questions. Plus one of the Imams involved. Plus the possiblity that it could encourage crazies in other coutries, like bin Laden was by Mogadishiu (sp?).

              Mid-Manhattan would be fine. Or wait until the towers are rebuilt. Jews are generally more careful about such things.

              I will note that I have done more to defend Islam than any other commenter on this site.

              • juvanya

                Good to see you want the towers rebuilt. I think thats what everyone wants. No one wants this Freedom Tower crap. The best way we could have defeated the terrorists would have been to clean up the site and rebuild it exactly with improved structural integrity.

        • perat

          I've read that people have made that offer to the mosque heads and they are insistent that the current location is where they want to build. That's really what's making me question the motive behind it. Like you, I'm pro building mosques because for me, freedom of religion is what makes america so great. But putting the mosque two blocks away from the terrorist attacks is kind of a provocation.

          I agree, they should move the mosque a few more blocks away to just make the issue go away. But I believe that the mosque builders are insistent that this place is the only place for their mosque.

          • Shy Guy

            The problem is not this or that mosque. The problem is Islam.

          • juvanya

            <img src=http://www.nypost.com/rw/nypost/2010/05/24/news/photos_stories/cropped/mosque_oped%20copy–300×300.jpg>

            People say the closeness doesnt matter since its two blocks, but this picture shows otherwise.

    • lemzia

      The imam has stated that the mosque is being built to as a symbol of peace to reach out and show that all followers of Islam are not bad. ( I am paraphrasing a bit because I dont know where to find the actual quote)

      with all the uproar that this has caused, they should, at the very least, abandon the site with a statement of – In light of all the issue's that this mosque has raised, we are going to build it elsewhere.

      I believe that this would now do more to show that the followers of Islam are willing to help heal the wounds caused on 9-11 and not make them worse.

      • Shy Guy

        lemzia 59p · 38 minutes ago

        The imam has stated that the mosque is being built to as a symbol of peace to reach out and show that all followers of Islam are not bad.

        Here are some quotes for you.

        Islam is evil. So are its followers, whether active or passive.

        Philistines upon you, America.

        • walt kovacs

          im just wondering if there were public hearings regarding the center

          thing is…construction in ny is still controlled by the mob (for real)…and no one works a project unless on a union

          they could easily run costs up so that the thing never gets built

          did you know that at every contruction project, they have to have a minimum number of cops on hand to direct traffic? and all those cops are on overtime? and if they cant get cops, they cant build?

          the nyc cops love their overtime….but hate terrorists worse

          the protests may all be for naught

          • Michael Zvi Krumbein

            They did. The immediate locals are for it, it seems, but not the rest of the city.

            Meanwhile, it turns out that half the site is contorlled by another corporation. Last I heard, they weren't out og the woods yet.

          • juvanya

            Is it really?

  • Michael Zvi Krumbein

    A reminder that lawfare was originally used (and still sometimes is) AGAINST the terrorists. Here are terror victims suing Al Jezzeera for giving targting info to Hezbolla.
    http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=121

    Also a reminder that people who get overly sensitive to actions against journalists (such as the traitor from Ha'aretz) cause our government to treat these people (both Al Jezeera and Anat Kam) with kid gloves – and thus get innocent people killed.

  • walt kovacs

    with cutbacks across the board in all us universities, im sure many israelis would love to return home

    • Michael Zvi Krumbein

      And American Aliyah is at a36-year high.

      • juvanya

        I hope to join that ASAP.

  • juvanya

    That article about the Iranian shows Irans real apartheid.