More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Our Friend, the US

Some good news from the US.

The U.S. House of Representatives has voted overwhelmingly to “strongly endorse” President George W. Bush’s April 14 declaration, which effectively rejected key Palestinian demands for an Israeli withdrawal to the pre-1967 war borders and a right of return for Palestinian refugees.

The resolution, passed 407-9 with three lawmakers voting “present” in the Wednesday vote, also backs Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s disengagement plan. The measure states that Congress “strongly endorses” the principles laid down by Bush in an April 14 letter to Sharon, including that it was “unrealistic” to expect Israel to pull back to borders that existed before the 1967 Mideast war because of the large Jewish populations that have settled in contested areas.

Sharon has proposed withdrawing from all Gaza Strip settlements and four West Bank enclaves.

The Bush letter also stated that a final status agreement on a Palestinian state must arrange for settling Palestinian refugees in that state, rather than in Israel.

“Put simply,” said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who sponsored the resolution with Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer “Israel must not retreat behind its 1949 borders, and there is no so-called right of return” for refugees.

“The president believes that this plan will make a real contribution toward peace and so do I,” Hoyer said. “This plan in my view is a bold historic opportunity to break the deadlock in Israeli-Palestinian relations.”

The second part of the resolution, which now goes to the Senate but is not legally binding, supports international efforts to build the will of Palestinians to fight terrorism and prevent the areas from which Israel has withdrawn from posing a threat to the security of Israel.

But don’t let this detail escape you:

There was some muted criticism, among Democrats, of the level of administration involvement in the Mideast peace process and the wording of the resolution.

Rep. Nick Rahall, who has complained that past resolutions on the Mideast have been one-sided in favor of Israel, said the language this time was slightly better, but asked “where were the Palestinians in this dialogue? … Where are the Palestinians involved in the discussions upon the no-return issue?”

Update: And what about this?

Democratic presidential contender John Kerry did not vote.

About the author

Picture of David Lange

David Lange

A law school graduate, David Lange transitioned from work in the oil and hi-tech industries into fulltime Israel advocacy. He is a respected commentator and Middle East analyst who has often been cited by the mainstream media
Picture of David Lange

David Lange

A law school graduate, David Lange transitioned from work in the oil and hi-tech industries into fulltime Israel advocacy. He is a respected commentator and Middle East analyst who has often been cited by the mainstream media
Scroll to Top