Remember when antisemite Marc Lamont Hill claimed his use of “from the River to the Sea, Palestine” was all about peace and justice?
My use of “river to the sea” was an invocation of a long history of political actors – liberal and radical, Palestinian and Israeli – who have called for their particular vision of justice in the area from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. For many, justice will come from a two-state solution. For some, like me, justice will come through a single bi-national democratic state that encompasses Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. I strongly believe that this is the best method to achieve peace, safety, security, and self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians. Justice requires that everyone, not just a single side, is free and equal.
He is not alone in making that claim; so many who support the so-called palestinian “right of return” claim to envisage a binational state where Jews can live in peace and security with their palestinian Arab overlords neighbors.
Either they didn’t ask those who plan to “return” or they know full well what would happen and don’t care:
(note: the translation was provided by QNN, whose video I downloaded, so they mistranslated “Jews” as “Zionists).
Of course, there are those who are more civilized than this guy and prefer to bring kitchen utensils.
But the real obstacle to peace is some Jew building a house in Judea.
