WATCH: Latest Transparent Palestinian Attempt to Co-Opt Anti-Trump Protests

Nothing subtle about this attempt to exploit anger against Donald Trump to foment even more hatred against Israel.

Notice how she refers to Israel as the “so-called” state of Israel. Again, this is about Israel’s very existence.

You also have to love her concern about Trump’s “homophobia.” Assuming she actually is palestinian, where she comes from, gays are murdered.

The fake tears at the end are the cherry on top.

65 thoughts on “WATCH: Latest Transparent Palestinian Attempt to Co-Opt Anti-Trump Protests”

  1. I don’t care much about Palestinians. I do care about Americans and I do care about Israelis. Many of the things this woman said about Donald Trump are demonstrably true. Not just as campaign antics, but increasingly, through his appointments to high office in a Trump Administration. Vice President-Elect Pence has a demonstrated hostility towards the LGBT community in the legislation he has supported and signed as Governor of Indiana. Michael Flynn, Trump’s designated National Security Adviser has a demonstrated hatred for Muslims. Sen. Jeff Sessions, Trump’s designated Attorney General, has a demonstrated animus towards African Americans and is being strongly opposed by the NAACP. Steven Bannon, Trump’s designated senior White House strategist and adviser to the president, is an avowed ethno-nationalist dedicated to returning America to Euro-centric cultural norms and as head of Breitbart, oversaw content that was consistently racist, Islamophobic, and misogynistic, making it the preferred home of the alt-Right movement. A good start if you have a perverse idea of what constitutes American values.

    1. Norman_In_New_York

      Your accusations against Sessions and Bannon are all lies. Cherry picking stray statements over 20 to 30 years proves nothing. Flynn’s critique of Islam is based on literal meanings of the Koran and Hadiths that are followed not only by ISIS, but by certain Muslim governments as well, along with the Muslim Brotherhood, which Obama has allowed to infiltrate the corridors of power in Washington.

      1. Statements/actions attributed to Sen. Sessions appear in congressional testimony in 1986 when he failed to be confirmed to the federal judiciary during the Reagan Administration. Bannon has openly admitted to the characterizations I listed above. I’ll let anyone who has followed Breitbart.com to judge for themselves if these accusations are accurate concerning his website. It is a fact that they are accusations that have been widely made and have been made for a very long time. Flynn’s characterizations of Muslims are bigoted and far outside the norms of accepted American values of fairness and inclusion.

        Oh, and while I’m at it, keep a close eye on the odds on favorite to be Trump’s pick for defense secretary – James Mattis. It is hard to see him as pro-Israel, unless you’re against settlements in the West Bank leading Israel on the road to becoming an apartheid state, which are his stated beliefs. Bet his appointment will get Israelis’ tongues wagging, especially right-wingers like Naftali Bennet and Caroline Glick.

        1. if mattis is the pick…i want all my jewish friends who have backed trump to get on their knees and apologize to me
          and i will only accept those apologize from their knees
          i hate being right

          1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

            And if the statements about Mattis are true, and if he is appointed, it still will not prove that Trump was a worse choice than Hillary.

        2. Norman_In_New_York

          1986? Many Americans weren’t even alive then, when Sessions was rejected by a Congress dominated by the opposition party. Afterwards, he served with distinction as a U.S. Attorney, enforcing the civil rights laws before being elected senator. I will deal with Bannon below.

          Mattis, of course, has not been appointed. If he did express the opinions you are attributing to him, it will emerge in the confirmation hearings should that happen. I note that Chuck Hagel had similar statements attributed to him when he was nominated, but he proved in the end to be a friend of Israel.

        3. ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Jim, you’ve already told us that your idea of an Israeli right winger is anyone to the right of Shulamit Aloni or Abu Mazzen.

          1. Front Page Mag?!!? What the hell is this? I’m open to dialogue with those of differing political points of view. But you really have to come up with a “news” source that is more responsible than this one. As bad as the mainstream media is, a rational society cannot rely on sources like this one, or Alex Jones’ “Info Wars” or Breitbart. They are sites devoted to commentary and advocacy heavilly dependent on irrational conspiracy theories. Obama was born in Hawaii. Rafael Cruz did not conspire to kill JFK. The mass killing at Sandy Hook Elementary was not a fake crime scene. 9-11 was not an inside job. This crap has got to stop.

      2. here is session’s record
        http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Jeff_Sessions_Civil_Rights.htm
        here is ben shapiro writing about bannon
        http://www.dailywire.com/news/8441/i-know-trumps-new-campaign-chairman-steve-bannon-ben-shapiro
        never, ever speak in absolutes unless you have the facts on your side
        you dont
        as for flynn, he has appeared on rt speaking out against usa policy
        and i have it from a very close friend who is an analyst and has worked with him that the man is an idiot
        loose lips sink ships and none are looser than flynns
        now go ahead…call me a liar

    2. This is precisely why this video is chillingly horrifying, and so dangerous. It is very nazi-esque. She takes things that are based in fact and manipulates them and blends them with outright fabrications and debased, hate-filled lies. The result is, that the things loosely based in fact give a cover of respectability to the hate-filled lies. There is hypocrisy there, that is more chilling than her mention of Trump’s “homophobia” – “we too have a dictator”. It’s not Netanyahu who is in the 11th year of a 4 year term. “Netanyahu called Trump to congratulate him” – and to invite him to the “Jewish Dictators Who Insidiously Rule the World” club? Many world leaders called him. It’s what happens after an election. But the worst was the comparing Palestinians to Latinos, Blacks and Muslims in America, then to triumphantly announce that this all took place on “Stolen Land”, chillingly to cheers from AMERICANS. Was the land in the U.S. stolen from Latinos and Muslims? Because she conveniently does not mention the group whom the land was essentially stolen from. The thing is, to protest the result of the election, is to protest democracy, and that’s a slippery slope. If this troll got through to someone like you, who is pro-Israel, this demonstrates how easy it is to use propaganda to manipulate people, and that’s a worry. The homophobic or anti-Muslim or racist comments made by Trump or his appointed people, also have basis in fact. That doesn’t mean that those comments weren’t offensive, but it also does not mean that those comments will lead to blatantly undemocratic or racist actions. So, for example, if I were to say, that some Muslims believe that their religion is superior and that they support the death penalty for Moslems who convert out of Islam, that’s based in fact. There is a rise in crime rate related to illegal drug cartels, that is associated with the illegal drug trade from Mexico. This does not mean that Trump’s actual comments weren’t grossly offensive. And it shouldn’t mean that this lady’s tearful talk of the fight to get every inch of Palestine back is not talking about genocide of the Jews, to the cheers of well-meaning Americans.

      1. I don’t buy her anti-Israel angle at all. I understand and agree with your point as to her invidious lies against Israel, but I’ve got bigger fish to fry dealing with President-Elect Trump. He’s beginning to demonstrate that he wasn’t just engaging in loose campaign talk. He really seems to mean all this ugly stuff he’s been saying for the last year and a half.

        1. You don’t buy it. Many less informed people did buy it. And that’s another issue. Bannon may or may not be racist, white supremacist or antisemitic, but many of the accusations are not based on what he has written, but are based on some of the support group he has attracted. But then, Hillary has attracted people like this woman.

          1. I am against trying to engage in guilt by association, a well-exercised practice these days by both the talking heads on the political left and right. But Bannon has proudly proclaimed that he wants Breitbart.com to be the home of the racist, Islamophobic, misogynist and anti-Semitic alt-Right. I think this really does reveal his political orientation and is not just a strategy to make his website click bait for a basket of deplorables (hat tip to Hillary).

            1. Norman_In_New_York

              I don’t read everything Breitbart publishes, but I have yet to find anything offensive to those not in the thrall of political correctness. If Bannon proclaimed what you say he proclaimed, I’d like to see it first hand instead of by the hearsay that’s flung around. I suspect that this demonization is based on the rants of trolls who invaded the comment section of certain articles. On the other hand, certain left-wing websites like the New Republic have eliminated the comment section altogether. By the way, Breitbart is not an Anglo-Saxon name.

              1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

                And if we are going to judge by the comments of the trolls, I guess American Thinker — which often prints pro-Jewish and pro-Israel articles — must be antisemitic as well.

              2. I didn’t say Bannon was an Anglophile, I said he wants Americans to embrace Euro-centrism as our cultural norm. Bannon is an Irish name, I’m guessing Breitbart might be German, but this has nothing to do with the points I’m making about Bannon.

            2. You are lying yet again. He never said anything remotely close to that. You have obviously never been to Breitbart – they have never had a single racist article nor are they Islamophobic or anything else.

              Do you know that the news site was created by Andrew Breitbart – A JEW correct? They are extremely pro-Israel

              You are the racist liar

            3. ahad_ha_amoratsim

              Can you tell us where he has said this?
              Dershowitz, no conservative, has said that he finds no evidence that Bannon is anti-Semitic.
              And Xianapolis (I’m spelling that name wrong, sorry) who is as gay as a three dollar bill, defends Bannon, Breitbart and the alt-right against charges of being anti-gay.

              Are there some disgustingly racist and anti-white creeps among the alt-right? You bet there are. What percentage of the alt-right do they represent? That’s what we don’t know.

              1. Joel Pollack, an orthodox Jew and senior editor at Breitbart, vigorously defends Bannon against charges of anti-Semitism. Bannon’s ex-wife claimed he did not want their kids to go to school with Jews. Ben Shapiro, formerly of Breitbart and no friend of Bannon, has said he saw no evidence of anti-Semitism in his personal behavior (Shapiro does see Bannon as vicious and extremely vindictive, qualities that make him a poor choice to be senior adviser in the White House.) Michelle Fields, former Breitbart reporter, was physically assaulted by then Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, and was then dumped by Bannon for obviously political reasons.

                Making Breitbart the home to the alt-Right, some of whom are most definitely anti-Semitic, is problematic for me. I don’t have hard and fast numbers, so I wouldn’t care to speculate the proportion of this shadowy group who fall into this category. Bannon’s statements on his own personal political philosophy are not hard to find on the internet. You can look them up and judge for yourself what kind of person you think Steven K. Bannon is. I’ve shared my views on the man based on my own reading of Breitbart. com, listening to Breitbart radio on Sirius Satellite Radio where Bannon was host until tabbed to join the Trump campaign, and critiques of Bannon by others, both on the political left and right.

                1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

                  Uncorroborated accusations made by one spouse against another are seldom given much credence, particularly when they are inconsistent with the past and present behavior of the accused spouse. Funny how no one has heard any similar remarks from him in the 10+ years since then, no one heard him say anything similar before, and nothing in his behavior is consistent with the charges she made.

            4. Really, he said exactly that? That he WANTS Breitbart to be the home of racist, islsmophobic, antisemitic groups? I don’t know the details and I don’t really have enough time to spend to be properly informed, but I read an article by Alan Dershowitz which said something to the effect that he hadn’t espoused antisemitic views but he has some very unsavoury people supporting him.

              1. Yes, Bannon really has said that he wants Breitbart to be the home of the alt-Right movement in print and on his radio show, repeatedly, enthusiastically. He couches it in terms of being anti-establishment and anti-PC. I am not calling Bannon an anti-Semite, but I am accusing him of enabling anti-Semitism and of not taking the steps necessary to strongly oppose it’s ugly ideals.

            5. What about when music evolves a new genre? Some record company might endevour to be a platform for that genre… doesn’t mean that the record company espouses virtues of the genre.. example, I doubt Sony Music Inc believes the rantings of some rap music.. killing police, joining gangs, beating and mistreating women, etc… It’s kinda how supply and demand works… when a demand is discovered, entrepreneurial people aspire to provide a supply, for a fee.
              IN any case, I look at Breitbart from time to time and have never found anything questionable.. unless it was satire… This includes the comment section where only once in a very rare while a negative comment is made towards ‘Jews’, but are in the context of soros, chomsky, sid, and their similar ilk.

        2. Didn’t obama oppose gay marriage when he came to office? Isn’t Trump the first president in US history that is not against it?

          1. You’re right about Obama (and the Clintons, too, for that matter). But he has supported the concept of marriage equality as a constitutional right some where down the line after he became president (he said he was “evolving” on the issue). What he hasn’t done, as Mike Pence has, is to continue to oppose marriage equality as a constitutional right, to say that the U.S. Supreme Court was wrong in striking down “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and “The Defense of Marriage Act” and the Obergefell v. Hodges decision holding that marriage equality is a constitutional right. Pence is actively engaged in a rear guard action trying to use “religious liberty” as a means to continue to discriminate against the LGBT community.

            1. So it’s guilt by association? And you reject the notion of separate personal and work beliefs? example, I doubt hillary actually supports rape.. maybe she destroys women who accuse her husband of it, but in any case, in her work life, she defended rapists… it was her job to provide a fair trial. It seems you are OK with GOP but you believe a good part of their supporters go against a minor details that many decide to define their entire life around…. Interesting considering Muslims (culture, law, activities in their countries) support DNC by over 80%.
              I agree with Trump.. it is (or should be) very obvious that different states have different characteristics and community standards. Who one is or isn’t attracted to is absolutely no business of the government,, any government… but so long as it, make it a individual state matter.
              BTW… in my area, simply teaching teenagers how to put on a condom is a big deal… it generates fairly substantial protests comprised of 10% African immigrants, 30% Chinese (or East Asians), 50% muslim and 10% evangelical Christians. *** Estimate by my observations

              1. Pence didn’t become the Vice President-Elect by having his name randomly drawn out of a hat (at least as far as we know). Donald Trump chose him and elevated him to this position of power in the national government. In the past Donald Trump has been seen, on social issues, to be in the mainstream of liberal Democrats (i.e. thought to be gay-friendly). But we still don’t know how he’s going to govern. Trump does seem to value personal loyalty to him over any other consideration in the appointments he has made so far. This is something you normally see in a Mafia don or an authoritarian strong man like Putin in Russia not something you expect from an American president.

                1. Well, presumably you would not understand, but in the private sector, loyalty and dedication are highly valued traits… keeps people focused on the task at hand rather than politicking. … Same as following instruction, implementing a strategy and acting in a professional manner.. not letting personal feelings cloud judgement, etc…
                  Here, this might calm your nerves:
                  http://www.inquisitr.com/3712270/donald-trump-on-lgbt-issues-poised-to-be-first-president-to-appoint-an-openly-gay-cabinet-member/

                  1. Thanks for sharing that info. It was somewhat reassuring. Right now we’re mostly hearing the concerns from those who opposed Donald Trump. But I’m pretty sure that a whole lot of his supporters are holding their breath about what kind of president Donald Trump is going to be. He was never really very clear or consistent in the policies that he would implement if elected. Well, we’re all going to find out in short order.

                    1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

                      This reluctant supporter is indeed holding his breath.
                      But that does not mean I am going to sit back while people make up outrageous lies. I am much more worried about outrageous lies being turned against Jews (they already are, of course, and have been for centuries; President Obama was more than willing to do so himself) than about laws to protect religious liberty being turned against us.

                    2. ahad_ha_amoratsim

                      We agree on that if nothing more.
                      So far I like what I see much better than what I saw during the campaign.

                      Still waiting for Obama to condemn the anti-Trump rioting, but then again, I’m still waiting for him to condemn the murder of any number of American citizens whose lives don’t count because they were Jews murdered by Balestinians.

                    3. With respect to President Obama’s handling of post-election events, it’s like two people who watch the same Broadway show and leave with distinctly different perceptions. For example, Mike Pence goes to “Hamilton” and says it’s great even though there were some boos and a lecture directed his way. Trump thinks the show is overrated and wants cast to apologize to Pence. I guess you can’t please everyone.

                  1. Again, you see Donald Trump as a conventional political figure driven by rational thought. I do not see him that way.

                    1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

                      Actually, I see him as a tremendous risk who was unfortunately our only alternative to Hillary. And as a rough beast, his hour come round at last, who slouches toward Washington to be inaugurated.

                      You seem him as someone to lie about with impunity.

            2. ahad_ha_amoratsim

              So you think the government does have the right to punish people who think it’s immoral and don’t want to be part of it. Good to know. When you come to close down our shuls and yeshivos and arrest our rabbis, we’ll be ready.

              1. People who break the law should be subject to it’s remedies. That’s true in America or Israel or any other place that has respect for the rule of law.

      2. ahad_ha_amoratsim

        If there were any record of ‘homophobic’ statements by Trump, don’t you think they would be front page news by now? Trump is on record as favoring same sex ‘marriage’ and favoring the right of men who want to call themselves women to use women’s locker rooms and rest rooms, and to h3ll with the sensibilities of any actual women who might be in there and might not like it.

        This is a perfect example of the SJW syllogisim:
        I don’t like people who favor x or y.
        I don’t like so-and-so because so-and-so favors x.
        Therefore so-and-so favors y.

        This is why ANSWER and similar groups smear each target with a similar litany of alleged sins. This is why people accuse the NRA of being anti-black and anti-gay. And this is why people accuse Israel of being behind the 9/11 attacks.

        1. Trump is a very special case. On just about any subject he’ll take a position, often a controversial one. Then he’ll walk that back after being challenged, sometimes within a few hours. Then he’ll turn around the next day and restate what he said before and had already walked back. You cannot tell what the man really believes, what is in his core, what will be his governing principles.

          1. ahad_ha_amoratsim

            When has he changed his position on LGBT issues? That’s one (actually two) where he has stayed consistent even though he knew it alienated a substantial part of his base. So what you seem to be saying is that because you detest him ( of that I’m a fan, either), it’s fair game to tell any lie about him, no matter how groundless. That attitude, of course, is one of the many things for which he is justly criticized.

            1. It’s not a lie to express concern about Donald Trump’s position on ANY issue, including LGBT rights. Have you paid really close attention to the way Donald Trump conducted his presidential campaign? He has been extremely vague and inconsistent on any number of policy issues. The national press expressed exasperation in trying to pin him down because he told a whopper nearly every single day of the campaign; they just couldn’t keep up with him.

    3. ahad_ha_amoratsim

      Pence signed a law that says you can’t send a Christian, Muslim or Jew for refusing to bake a gay-themed wedding cake or to video or photograph a same sex wedding ceremony. Oh, the horror! The public stoning of gays is only one short step away!

      The allegations against Sessions are over 30 years old, and are belied by his actions against the KKK as US Attorney and as state Attorney General.

      1. It’s easy to be dismissive if you are not part of the group that is being targeted for discrimination. Be very careful what you are willing to accept as a constitutional right. “Religious liberty” used to discriminate against gays today could, in the future, easily be used against racial minorities or Muslims or Jews to discriminate against them just for being who they are; that they violate some Christian principle deeply held by certain religious individuals or groups.

        1. Kathy Prendergast

          Gay marriage became an issue only because a tiny segment of the gay community decided it was going to be. Personally I don’t care who gets married, as long as they try to stay married once they have children, because one thing we do know for a fact is that divorce is devastating for children. I wish more straight people would get married before they have children, or at least get married and stay together once they have them, because growing up in a single parent home completely sucks for a child. But gay couples, mostly female gay couples because they have always been far more interested in living a monogamous life and raising children together than gay men, had been forming permanent civil unions, having their own private wedding cermonies, religous and otherwise (I attended a few myself back in the 80s and 90s), having and raising children, etc. with no problems and no discrimination for decades before this whole gay marriage issue exploded into the public arena. Anyone who believes that it was spontenous and not planned and orchestrated by the forces of cultural Marxism, to radically and fundamentally redefine marriage itself and therefore completely undermine it and its purpose in our society, was not paying attention. These forces genuinely believe that they have both the ability and the right to wipe out all vestiges of religous opposition, not because those religious people are really significant enough to make life difficult for them, but because they cannot accept the presence in our society of people who are not 100% on board with their radical agenda. This is the essence of cultural Marxism, because it cannot tolerate dissent, to identify, stigmatize, humiliate, and punish – by finacial ruination, jail, or both – those who are not getting with the program. So no, as a non-religious and a pro-gay person, I will not support these fascists. Gay women are a tiny minority, and most gay men do not give a f**k about the “right” to get legally married; they really don’t. Nor do they feel any more “targeted” since Trump’s election than they did previously. Many of them, in fact, voted for Trump. How do you explain that? Or is there some derogatory term in the gay community, like those applied to blacks who do not toe the leftist party line, like “coons”, “house negroes”, or “Uncle Toms”?

          1. I mostly agree with you on attitudes towards marriage and child rearing among gay men and lesbians, although things are changing among younger members of the LGBT community. I want to see some statistics to be convinced that a significant percentage of the LGBT community abandoned the Democrats to support Donald Trump. In past elections, LGBT support for the Democratic Party was well over 80%.

        2. ahad_ha_amoratsim

          Yes, Jim — it’s easy to be dismissive if you are not part of the group whose religious beliefs do not have the official liberal and governmental stamp of approval, and have been targeted for discrimination.

          How interesting that not one of the businesses that have been prosecuted has refused to do business with gay customers generally, or has been accused of mistreating gay customers. All they have done is say “Sorry, I can’t in good conscience take part in your ‘wedding’ as a photographer or by making a special gay themed wedding cake. The bakery offered to sell them any cake in the store, but nothing would do for the plaintiffs– or the state — except enthusiastic compliance with the demand to honor the wedding ceremony by making a specially designed cake.

    4. Kathy Prendergast

      Oh, get over it. The Indiana legislation was not and is not “hostile to the LGBT community”, it’s about protecting the right of private business owners to act according to their religious belief, even if that means refusing a particular service to someone and losing potential revenue. Anyone who believes in the American Constitution should support that principle too, regardless of their religion, or lack thereof. These attacks, boycotts, and lawsuits or complaints against a handful of Christian-owned small businesses by members of the LGBT community are the result of a deliberate campaign to punish Christians who persist in believing what their religion compels them to believe about gay marriage (and isn’t it interesting that they never seem to target Orthodox Jewish or Muslim-owned businesses for these stunts?) Do not believe for a minute that they were just randomly approached by sincere gay couples who wanted cakes and flowers for their weddings, then were hurt and devastated when they were told “no”, when there were probably dozens of other businesses they could have gone to that would have been happy for their business. They are sought out and targeted. I think they’re fools myself, for turning away potential paying customers, that seems like a silly way to run a business, but being bad businesspeople is not a crime, and punishing them for doing so makes this an issue of government-initiated force against private individuals who are not committing aggression against others but simply acting on their conscience, which goes blatantly against the principles of the U.S. Constitution. If left to its own devices, the free market eventually takes care of people who let their religious beliefs get too much in the way of turning a profit. Giving government more power to make people toe the line just makes everything worse, for everyone. The bottom line is,in a truly free society, if you want cakes or flowers for your wedding, seek out a business willing to provide them, which are never hard to come by in a free market, or make them yourself. Nobody owes you these things.

      1. If you are accusing pro-gay rights groups like the Human Rights Campaign of carefully choosing the plaintiffs they support in trying to overturn discriminatory anti-gay laws, then you’d be right. This is not the act of some dark, vindictive conspiratorial clique, but reflects a smart and effective legal strategy by a group who knows how to operate within our legal system.

  2. “Gaza, which is an open air prison, nothing is allowed to come in or to leave. This has been going on for over thirty years.” let’s ignore COGOT’s heir feed and look at the math. 2016 – 2005 = 30+…

  3. Kathy Prendergast

    Back in the 80s and 90s they were a common fashion statement, and I had one myself (hey, it kept my neck warm in winter, and black and white goes with everything), but…I’ve never seen so many keffiyehs in my life as I have in the past 10 days. I rather suspect there is more of a political motication behind them than a need to look sharp and keep out the winter chill. And don’t the women wearing them know that only men wear them in the Middle East?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top