Der Angry White Kid (dAWK) is up to his old tricks again. While he would like people to think that he is a champion of the oppressed, he is nothing more than a terror apologist.
In his latest ranting, he claims that Israel violated the ceasefire by killing 6 PLO Arabs.
I’m all for ceasefires. I think the killings on both sides are sad and tragic. But the fact of the matter is that for a ceasefire to work, there actually has to be a cessation of firing. That means you can’t kill six Palestinians, at least two of them children, in less than a week and continue to call it a ceasefire. PA spokesperson Abd Allah Abd Allah points out,It is either that the Israeli government can’t rein in its terrorist army, or the government itself is instructing the army to keep up the killing order to provoke the Palestinians to retaliate.I don’t think the ceasefire should be foresaken yet, but if this past week is any hint as to what the future holds, this agreement’s carcass will be thown onto the ever-growing pile of broken deals. The past two ceasefires called by the Palestinians have gone the same way. Palestinian militants halt their attacks, Israel keeps killing Palestinians, and eventually Palestinians retaliate. Newspapers then read, “Months of relative calm shattered by terrorist attack.” “Relative calm” or “lull in violence” of course are terms that only apply to the Israelis.
Here, dAWK suggests that Israel “keeps killing Palestinians, and eventually Palestinians retaliate”. So what about last week’s unprovoked attacks on Israel, in which PLO Arab terrorists fired mortar shells and rockets into Israel? The fact that he did not speak out then, but does speak out now (when he claims Israel has killed PLO Arabs), shows he is either ignorant as to what is going on, or knows what is going on but chooses to ignore it. Either way, he supports the very people targeting innocents for death, and does not acknowledge that the innocents should be able to defend themselves.
This is also manifest in the fact that he quotes al Crapeeza as his source for proving that Israel killed ‘innocent’ PLO Arabs. Yet each of these incidents involved Israeli claims that the victims were involved in acts of terrorism. (Given past experience, in which we have seen PLO Arab children, women, and donkeys used for terror attacks, I know which account is the more credible). Despite al Crapeeza’s penchant for lying and forsaking any pretense of objectivity in its reporting, dAWK automatically takes its word as gospel. I suppose dAWK will also automatically accept Syria’s claims that Israel was behind the Hariri assassination?
Some of my readers are probably asking “why are you even bothering with this guy?” Well, I think it is important to expose people like dAWK for what they really stand for – especially since there are many more like him on campuses around the world. They claim to be champions of the underdog and victim, but they are not really. They are people who unintentionally or deliberately ignore the facts behind a conflict, and choose to support the side making the most noise – with bombs and guns. And by not speaking out about the horrific crimes perpetrated by the people they support, the dAWKs of the world cross the line from possible ignorance to definite moral corruptness.
