Just a few days before Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán’s first official visit to Israel, the media is already speculating. Orbán is called controversial, despotic, far-right, and often even, antisemitic.
And yet, Hungary is undoubtedly a haven for Jews in Europe. What’s more, Hungary is one of the few countries that isn’t shying away from going against the mainstream anti-Israel engagements, and stands with Israel on the international scene. Be it in Brussels at the EU or in New York City at the UN, Hungary’s voice is heard when it rejects anti-Israeli or anti-Jewish policy proposals.
It isn’t easy to normalize the relationship between people, especially not when generations grew up with prejudices towards each other. Statistics assessing the level of antisemitic feelings are frequently published, but the question remains: Are they really projecting a reality? Is antisemitism the same in Hungary as it is in France? Can we or should we distinguish between different types of antisemitism?
Antisemitism is unacceptable in any forms.
However, as history has shown us over and over again, the idea of eliminating antisemitism entirely is a Utopian view. Therefore, the aim of any country should be to reduce anti-semitism to the minimum, to make sure that their Jewish communities can live safely, without fearing both physical and emotional attacks.
When assessing Europe at large, Hungary, despite the quick and reflexive labels, is not the hotbed of antisemitism.
In a rare and recent talk, Barnabas Turai – representing a left-leaning Hungarian media outlet – sat down with the Israeli Ambassador to Hungary, Yossi Amrani.
“As an Israeli, I am quite thankful for Hungary for its support of Israel. You as a Hungarian can be proud of the moral support, the leadership, the courage your government, your diplomats are showing in different international arenas,” said Ambassador Amrni.
Echoing the Ambassador’s positive viewpoint, executive rabbi of the Unified Hungarian Jewish Congregation Slomó Köves, said in an earlier interview:
“When the prime minister of the country openly praises the Jewish state and the leader of the Jewish state, I don’t think there’s any other tool which is more effective at decreasing the antisemitism of the local population.”
In another recent survey – by an openly left-wing professor – András Kovács reported that the Hungarian Jews greatly overrate the level of antisemitism in Hungary in relation to the actual atrocities. And this is underlined by the fresh TEV (Jewish community’s watchdog on antisemitism) statistics as well. The report shows that the number of verbal or physical attacks against Jews is not only dramatically decreasing in comparison to the 1990s in Hungary but when compared to the European statistics, Hungary also shows encouragingly low numbers when benchmarked against similarly populated Western European countries.
Physical attacks on Jews in Hungary are almost nonexistent, regardless of how the media attempts to project Hungary. The Orbán government has a zero-tolerance policy on antisemitism and, as opposed to countries like the UK, Hungary’s educational curriculum places a heavy emphasize on Holocaust education.
As Ambassador Amrani continued:
“What do we have in Hungary? More than a quarter of a million Israeli tourists travelling here, and they are safe. You have the largest Jewish community in Central Europe; my information is that they feel safe as well. And you have the rebirth of Jewish life in this country, with an investment in hospitals, in the renovation of synagogues, in Jewish culture. This means respect; this means integration and a certain reverence for Jewish culture.
This is not antisemitism, by my definition of antisemitism. I think Hungarians, once people accuse them of being anti-Semites, should ask for proof. They should be on the offensive, and not be on the defensive of this issue.”
Undoubtedly, there will always be people in any country who will project antisemitic traits.
But should we judge a nation based on its minority? Or can we start acknowledging the shift that is happening in Hungary and, with that, set a new direction and a new future to two peoples whose futures should not be determined by their past?
This article is a result of information exchange between a group of Hungarian non-Jewish and Jewish journalists who devote their time to normalize the relationship between the two countries by ensuring unbiased media coverage.